Catálogo de publicaciones - revistas

Compartir en
redes sociales


Science

Resumen/Descripción – provisto por la editorial

No disponible.

Palabras clave – provistas por la editorial

No disponibles.

Disponibilidad
Institución detectada Período Navegá Descargá Solicitá
No detectada desde mar. 1997 / hasta dic. 2023 Science Journals

Información

Tipo de recurso:

revistas

ISSN impreso

0036-8075

ISSN electrónico

1095-9203

Editor responsable

American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

País de edición

Estados Unidos

Fecha de publicación

Cobertura temática

Tabla de contenidos

Cheap Pix

Palabras clave: Multidisciplinary.

Pp. 785-785

Stress Inside Out

Palabras clave: Multidisciplinary.

Pp. 785-785

Signal Scaffolds

Palabras clave: Multidisciplinary.

Pp. 785-785

Surprise Attack

Palabras clave: Multidisciplinary.

Pp. 785-785

Modules of Desire

Palabras clave: Multidisciplinary.

Pp. 785-785

ATAXIN Clock

Palabras clave: Multidisciplinary.

Pp. 785-785

Nuclear Actin in Action

Palabras clave: Multidisciplinary.

Pp. 785-785

Fabricating Quartz

Palabras clave: Multidisciplinary.

Pp. 785-785

Melting Away

Palabras clave: Multidisciplinary.

Pp. 785-785

Impact Factor Distortions

Bruce Alberts

<jats:p> This Editorial coincides with the release of the <jats:italic>San Francisco declaration on research Assessment</jats:italic> (DORA), the outcome of a gathering of concerned scientists at the December 2012 meeting of the American Society for Cell Biology. <jats:xref ref-type="fn">*</jats:xref> To correct distortions in the evaluation of scientific research, DORA aims to stop the use of the "journal impact factor" in judging an individual scientist's work. The <jats:italic>Declaration</jats:italic> states that the impact factor must not be used as "a surrogate measure of the quality of individual research articles, to assess an individual scientist's contributions, or in hiring, promotion, or funding decisions." DORA also provides a list of specific actions, targeted at improving the way scientific publications are assessed, to be taken by funding agencies, institutions, publishers, researchers, and the organizations that supply metrics. These recommendations have thus far been endorsed by more than 150 leading scientists and 75 scientific organizations, including the American Association for the Advancement of Science (the publisher of <jats:italic>Science</jats:italic> ). Here are some reasons why: </jats:p>

Palabras clave: Multidisciplinary.

Pp. 787-787