Catálogo de publicaciones - revistas
Science
Resumen/Descripción – provisto por la editorial
No disponible.
Palabras clave – provistas por la editorial
No disponibles.
Disponibilidad
| Institución detectada | Período | Navegá | Descargá | Solicitá |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No detectada | desde mar. 1997 / hasta dic. 2023 | Science Journals |
Información
Tipo de recurso:
revistas
ISSN impreso
0036-8075
ISSN electrónico
1095-9203
Editor responsable
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
País de edición
Estados Unidos
Fecha de publicación
1880-
Cobertura temática
Tabla de contenidos
Raising the dead How to Clone a Mammoth: The Science of De-Extinction Beth Shapiro Princeton University Press, 2015. 250 pp.
A. Rus Hoelzel
<jats:p>Confronting the technical challenges of reversing extinction</jats:p>
Palabras clave: Multidisciplinary.
Pp. 388-388
The quest for a magic bullet The Lock and Key of Medicine: Monoclonal Antibodies and the Transformation of Healthcare Lara V. Marks Yale University Press, 2015. 344 pp.
Sudhakaran Prabakaran
<jats:p>Widely used in science and medicine today, monoclonal antibodies got off to a rocky start</jats:p>
Palabras clave: Multidisciplinary.
Pp. 389-389
Books Received
<jats:p> A <jats:ext-link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.sciencemag.org/site/feature/data/books/brl6246.xhtml">listing of books received</jats:ext-link> at <jats:italic>Science</jats:italic> during the week ending 17 July 2015. </jats:p>
Palabras clave: Multidisciplinary.
Pp. 389-389
Precision medicine: Look to the mice
K. C. Kent Lloyd; Terry Meehan; Arthur Beaudet; Steve Murray; Karen Svenson; Colin McKerlie; David West; Iva Morse; Helen Parkinson; Steve Brown; Ann-Marie Mallon; Mark Moore
Palabras clave: Multidisciplinary.
Pp. 390-390
Sexism discussion misses the point
Hillary S. Young
Palabras clave: Multidisciplinary.
Pp. 390-391
Comment on “Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines”
Donna K. Ginther; Shulamit Kahn
<jats:p> Leslie <jats:italic>et al</jats:italic> . (Reports, 16 January 2015, p. 262) concluded that “expectations of brilliance” explained the gender makeup of academic disciplines. We reestimated their models after adding measures of disaggregated Graduate Record Examination scores by field. Our results indicated that female representation among Ph.D. recipients is associated with the field’s mathematical content and that faculty beliefs about innate ability were irrelevant. </jats:p>
Palabras clave: Multidisciplinary.
Pp. 391-391
Chimpanzees deserve their freedom
Steven M. Wise
Palabras clave: Multidisciplinary.
Pp. 391-391
Response to Comment on “Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines”
Andrei Cimpian; Sarah-Jane Leslie
<jats:p>Ginther and Kahn claim that academics’ beliefs about the importance of brilliance do not predict gender gaps in Ph.D. attainment beyond mathematics and verbal test scores. However, Ginther and Kahn’s analyses are problematic, exhibiting more than 100 times the recommended collinearity thresholds. Multiple analyses that avoid this problem suggest that academics’ beliefs are in fact uniquely predictive of gender gaps across academia.</jats:p>
Palabras clave: Multidisciplinary.
Pp. 391-391
Rice is on the lookout for bugs
B. Pogson
Palabras clave: Multidisciplinary.
Pp. 392-392
Keeping synaptic plasticity plastic
P. J. Hines
Palabras clave: Multidisciplinary.
Pp. 392-392