Catálogo de publicaciones - revistas

Compartir en
redes sociales

Science

Resumen/Descripción – provisto por la editorial

No disponible.

Palabras clave – provistas por la editorial

No disponibles.

Disponibilidad

Institución detectada	Período	Navegá	Descargá	Solicitá
No detectada	desde mar. 1997 / hasta dic. 2023	Science Journals

Información

Tipo de recurso:

revistas

ISSN impreso

0036-8075

ISSN electrónico

1095-9203

Editor responsable

American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

País de edición

Estados Unidos

Fecha de publicación

1880-

Cobertura temática

Ciencias naturales

Tabla de contenidos

Verificá que desde tu institución tengas acceso para descargar o solicitar el libro completo o alguno de sus capítulos.

doi: 10.1126/science.aal1325

Response to Comments on “Outburst flood at 1920 BCE supports historicity of China’s Great Flood and the Xia dynasty”

Qinglong Wu; Zhijun Zhao; Li Liu; Darryl E. Granger; Hui Wang; David J. Cohen; Xiaohong Wu; Maolin Ye; Ofer Bar-Yosef; Bin Lu; Jin Zhang; Peizhen Zhang; Daoyang Yuan; Wuyun Qi; Linhai Cai; Shibiao Bai

<jats:p> Wu <jats:italic>et al</jats:italic> ., Han, and Huang <jats:italic>et al</jats:italic> . question our reconstruction of a large outburst flood and its possible relationship to China’s Great Flood and the Xia dynasty. Here, we clarify misconceptions concerning geologic evidence of the flood, its timing and magnitude, and the complex social-cultural response. We also further discuss how this flood may be related to ancient accounts of the Great Flood and origins of the Xia dynasty. </jats:p>

Palabras clave: Multidisciplinary.

Pp. 1382-1382

doi: 10.1126/science.aak9657

Comment on “Outburst flood at 1920 BCE supports historicity of China’s Great Flood and the Xia dynasty”

Chun Chang Huang; Yali Zhou; Yuzhu Zhang; Yongqiang Guo; Jiangli Pang; Qiang Zhou; Tao Liu; Xiaochun Zha

<jats:p> Wu <jats:italic>et al</jats:italic> . (Reports, 5 August 2016, p. 579) reported an enormous flood in the upper Yellow River that destroyed the Lajia Ruins. However, published research shows that the Ruins were destroyed at 3950 years before the present (B.P.) by earthquakes accompanied with mudflows, whereas the landslide-dammed lake terminated about 5650 years B.P. Various kinds of sediments with different ages were taken as evidence to verify an outburst flood. </jats:p>

Palabras clave: Multidisciplinary.

Pp. 1382-1382

doi: 10.1126/science.aal1369

Comment on “Outburst flood at 1920 BCE supports historicity of China’s Great Flood and the Xia dynasty”

Jian-Chiu Han

<jats:p> By analyzing the data and methodology of Wu <jats:italic>et al</jats:italic> . (Reports, 5 August 2016, p. 579), I find that their conclusions about the scale of the dammed lake, the dating of the lake, and the peak discharge at the point of dam failure and at the Lajia site cannot be validated. The conjecture of the supposed Great Flood and its impact on the formation of the early Chinese dynasty is not substantiated. </jats:p>

Palabras clave: Multidisciplinary.

Pp. 1382-1382

doi: 10.1126/science.aal1278

Comment on “Outburst flood at 1920 BCE supports historicity of China’s Great Flood and the Xia dynasty”

Wenxiang Wu; Junhu Dai; Yang Zhou; Quansheng Ge

<jats:p> Wu <jats:italic>et al</jats:italic> . (Reports, 5 August 2016, p. 579) reported geological and archaeological evidence about an earthquake-induced landslide dam outburst flood around 1920 BCE and claimed a support to the historicity of China’s legendary Great Flood and Xia dynasty. We argue that the physical evidence is unreliable and their arguments are unconvincing. </jats:p>

Palabras clave: Multidisciplinary.

Pp. 1382-1382

doi: 10.1126/science.aam9830