Catálogo de publicaciones - revistas

Compartir en
redes sociales


Science

Resumen/Descripción – provisto por la editorial

No disponible.

Palabras clave – provistas por la editorial

No disponibles.

Disponibilidad
Institución detectada Período Navegá Descargá Solicitá
No detectada desde mar. 1997 / hasta dic. 2023 Science Journals

Información

Tipo de recurso:

revistas

ISSN impreso

0036-8075

ISSN electrónico

1095-9203

Editor responsable

American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

País de edición

Estados Unidos

Fecha de publicación

Cobertura temática

Tabla de contenidos

EXCLUSIVE: Controversial experiments that could make bird flu more risky poised to resume

Jocelyn Kaiser

Palabras clave: Multidisciplinary.

Pp. No disponible

Top stories: bees doing math, the link between gut bacteria and mood, and a potato breeding revolution

Alex Fox

Palabras clave: Multidisciplinary.

Pp. No disponible

Worrisome nonstick chemicals are common in U.S. drinking water, federal study suggests

Natasha Gilbert

Palabras clave: Multidisciplinary.

Pp. No disponible

New DOE policies would block many foreign research collaborations

Jeffrey Mervis

Palabras clave: Multidisciplinary.

Pp. No disponible

Comment on “Friction at the bed does not control fast glacier flow”

Brent M. MinchewORCID; Colin R. MeyerORCID; Samuel S. PeglerORCID; Bradley P. LipovskyORCID; Alan W. RempelORCID; G. Hilmar GudmundssonORCID; Neal R. Iverson

<jats:p>Stearns and van der Veen (Reports, 20 July 2018, p. 273) conclude that fast glacier sliding is independent of basal drag (friction), even where drag balances most of the driving stress. This conclusion raises fundamental physical issues, the most striking of which is that sliding velocity would be independent of stresses imparted through the ice column, including gravitational driving stress.</jats:p>

Palabras clave: Multidisciplinary.

Pp. No disponible

Erratum for the Research Article “Characterizing mutagenic effects of recombination through a sequence-level genetic map” by B. V. Halldorsson, G. Palsson, O. A. Stefansson, H. Jonsson, M. T. Hardarson, H. P. Eggertsson, B. Gunnarsson, A. Oddsson, G. H. H

Palabras clave: Multidisciplinary.

Pp. No disponible

Separating host and microbiome contributions to drug pharmacokinetics and toxicity

Michael ZimmermannORCID; Maria Zimmermann-KogadeevaORCID; Rebekka WegmannORCID; Andrew L. GoodmanORCID

<jats:title>Off-target drug metabolism</jats:title> <jats:p> Anything humans swallow is exposed to the foraging and transforming activities of the gut microbiota. This applies to therapeutic drugs as well as food components and can be a major source of interpersonal variation in drug efficacy and toxicity. Zimmermann <jats:italic>et al.</jats:italic> found that individual drug responses depend on the genetics of an individual's microbiota. They explored the metabolism of nucleoside drugs (which are used as antivirals and antidepressants) in mice inoculated with a variety of mutant microbiota. They then modeled the pharmacokinetics in different body compartments and identified the host and microbe contributions. In some individuals, up to 70% of drug transformation can be ascribed to microbial metabolism. </jats:p> <jats:p> <jats:italic>Science</jats:italic> , this issue p. <jats:related-article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" ext-link-type="doi" related-article-type="in-this-issue" xlink:href="10.1126/science.aat9931">eaat9931</jats:related-article> </jats:p>

Palabras clave: Multidisciplinary.

Pp. No disponible

Aerosol-driven droplet concentrations dominate coverage and water of oceanic low-level clouds

Daniel RosenfeldORCID; Yannian ZhuORCID; Minghuai Wang; Youtong ZhengORCID; Tom GorenORCID; Shaocai Yu

<jats:title>Reflections on cloud effects</jats:title> <jats:p> How much impact does the abundance of cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) aerosols above the oceans have on global temperatures? Rosenfeld <jats:italic>et al.</jats:italic> analyzed how CCN affect the properties of marine stratocumulus clouds, which reflect much of the solar radiation received by Earth back to space (see the Perspective by Sato and Suzuki). The CCN abundance explained most of the variability in the radiative cooling. Thus, the magnitude of radiative forcing provided by these clouds is much more sensitive to the presence of CCN than current models indicate, which suggests the existence of other compensating warming effects. </jats:p> <jats:p> <jats:italic>Science</jats:italic> , this issue p. <jats:related-article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" ext-link-type="doi" related-article-type="in-this-issue" xlink:href="10.1126/science.aav0566">eaav0566</jats:related-article> ; see also p. <jats:related-article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" ext-link-type="doi" issue="6427" page="580" related-article-type="in-this-issue" vol="363" xlink:href="10.1126/science.aaw3720">580</jats:related-article> </jats:p>

Palabras clave: Multidisciplinary.

Pp. No disponible

Strengthened scientific support for the Endangerment Finding for atmospheric greenhouse gases

Philip B. DuffyORCID; Christopher B. FieldORCID; Noah S. DiffenbaughORCID; Scott C. DoneyORCID; Zoe DuttonORCID; Sherri Goodman; Lisa Heinzerling; Solomon HsiangORCID; David B. LobellORCID; Loretta J. MickleyORCID; Samuel Myers; Susan M. NataliORCID; Camille ParmesanORCID; Susan TierneyORCID; A. Park WilliamsORCID

<jats:title>The case for endangerment</jats:title> <jats:p> In 2009, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) established the so-called “Endangerment Finding.” This defined a suite of six long-lived greenhouse gases as “air pollution.” Such air pollution was anticipated to represent a danger to the health and welfare of current and future generations. Thus, the EPA has the authority to regulate these gases under the rules of the U.S. Clean Air Act. Duffy <jats:italic>et al.</jats:italic> provide a comprehensive review of the scientific evidence gathered in the years since then. These findings further support and strengthen the basis of the Endangerment Finding. Thus, a compelling case has been made even more compelling with an enormous body of additional data. </jats:p> <jats:p> <jats:italic>Science</jats:italic> , this issue p. <jats:related-article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" ext-link-type="doi" related-article-type="in-this-issue" xlink:href="10.1126/science.aat5982">eaat5982</jats:related-article> </jats:p>

Palabras clave: Multidisciplinary.

Pp. No disponible

Response to Comment on “Friction at the bed does not control fast glacier flow”

Leigh A. StearnsORCID; Cornelis van der VeenORCID

<jats:p> Minchew <jats:italic>et al</jats:italic> . take issue with our main conclusion that friction at the glacier bed does not control fast glacier flow. In this response, we further justify our methodology. We also point out that numerical studies referred to by Minchew <jats:italic>et al</jats:italic> . rely on inversions that are based on a sliding relation in which sliding speed is proportional to basal drag. Furthermore, observational studies referred to by Minchew <jats:italic>et al</jats:italic> . apply to glaciological settings that do not correspond to the terminal regions of Greenland outlet glaciers that we studied. </jats:p>

Palabras clave: Multidisciplinary.

Pp. No disponible