Catálogo de publicaciones - revistas
Obesity Reviews
Resumen/Descripción – provisto por la editorial en inglés
Obesity Reviews is a monthly journal publishing reviews on all disciplines related to obesity and its comorbidities. This includes basic and behavioral sciences, clinical treatment and outcomes, epidemiology, prevention and public health. The journal should, therefore, appeal to all professionals with an interest in obesity and its comorbidities. Review types may include systematic narrative reviews, quantitative meta-analyses and narrative reviews but all must offer new insights, critical or novel perspectives that will enhance the state of knowledge in the field. Prevalence studies that compare (review) trends across countries or regions or across ethnic groups or relevant subpopulations and provide novel insights and/or conclusions will be considered. The journal also invites short reviews presenting original or challenging theories, hypotheses or alternative interpretations of findings. Case reports presenting important and novel information and Letters to the Editor are also welcome. The journal will contribute to education and inter-professional developments by planning pro and con reviews on current controversies.The editorial policy is to publish high quality peer-reviewed manuscripts that provide needed new insight into all aspects of obesity and its related comorbidities while minimizing the period between submission and publication.
Palabras clave – provistas por la editorial
Obesity; obese; overweight; body-weight; weight; body fat; waist circumference; type 2 diabetes; lep
Disponibilidad
| Institución detectada | Período | Navegá | Descargá | Solicitá |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No detectada | desde ene. 2000 / hasta dic. 2023 | Wiley Online Library |
Información
Tipo de recurso:
revistas
ISSN impreso
1467-7881
ISSN electrónico
1467-789X
Editor responsable
John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (WILEY)
País de edición
Estados Unidos
Fecha de publicación
2000-
Cobertura temática
Tabla de contenidos
doi: 10.1111/obr.12067
Overweight and obesity are associated with musculoskeletal complaints as early as childhood: a systematic review
W. D. Paulis; S. Silva; B. W. Koes; M. van Middelkoop
Palabras clave: Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health; Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism.
Pp. 52-67
doi: 10.1111/obr.12496
Early post-operative psychosocial and weight predictors of later outcome in bariatric surgery: a systematic literature review
A. Hindle
; X. de la Piedad Garcia; L. Brennan
Palabras clave: Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health; Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism.
Pp. 317-334
doi: 10.1111/obr.13146
Ultraprocessed food and chronic noncommunicable diseases: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of 43 observational studies
Melissa M. Lane
; Jessica A. Davis; Sally Beattie; Clara Gómez‐Donoso; Amy Loughman; Adrienne O'Neil; Felice Jacka; Michael Berk; Richard Page; Wolfgang Marx; Tetyana Rocks
<jats:title>Summary</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:label/><jats:p>This systematic review and meta‐analysis investigated the association between consumption of ultraprocessed food and noncommunicable disease risk, morbidity and mortality. Forty‐three observational studies were included (<jats:italic>N</jats:italic>= 891,723): 21 cross‐sectional, 19 prospective, two case‐control and one conducted both a prospective and cross‐sectional analysis. Meta‐analysis demonstrated consumption of ultraprocessed food was associated with increased risk of overweight (odds ratio: 1.36; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.23‐1.51;<jats:italic>P</jats:italic>< 0.001), obesity (odds ratio: 1.51; 95% CI, 1.34‐1.70;<jats:italic>P</jats:italic>< 0.001), abdominal obesity (odds ratio: 1.49; 95% CI, 1.34‐1.66;<jats:italic>P</jats:italic>< 0.0001), all‐cause mortality (hazard ratio: 1.28; 95% CI, 1.11‐1.48;<jats:italic>P</jats:italic>= 0.001), metabolic syndrome (odds ratio: 1.81; 95% CI, 1.12‐2.93;<jats:italic>P</jats:italic>= 0.015) and depression in adults (hazard ratio: 1.22; 95% CI, 1.16‐1.28,<jats:italic>P</jats:italic>< 0.001) as well as wheezing (odds ratio: 1.40; 95% CI, 1.27‐1.55;<jats:italic>P</jats:italic>< 0.001) but not asthma in adolescents (odds ratio: 1.20; 95% CI, 0.99‐1.46;<jats:italic>P</jats:italic>= 0.065). In addition, consumption of ultraprocessed food was associated with cardiometabolic diseases, frailty, irritable bowel syndrome, functional dyspepsia and cancer (breast and overall) in adults while also being associated with metabolic syndrome in adolescents and dyslipidaemia in children. Although links between ultraprocessed food consumption and some intermediate risk factors in adults were also highlighted, further studies are required to more clearly define associations in children and adolescents.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Study registration</jats:title><jats:p>Prospero ID: CRD42020176752.</jats:p></jats:sec>
Pp. No disponible
doi: 10.1111/obr.13529
Prevalence of food addiction among patients undergoing metabolic/bariatric surgery: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
Dafiny R. Praxedes
; André E. Silva‐Júnior
; Mateus L. Macena
; Ashley N. Gearhardt
; Nassib B. Bueno
<jats:title>Summary</jats:title><jats:p>Candidates for metabolic/bariatric surgery show a high prevalence of food addiction (FA). However, few studies have investigated FA prevalence after bariatric surgery, especially using longitudinal studies. This systematic review with a meta‐analysis aimed to determine pre‐ and postoperative prevalence of FA among patients undergoing metabolic/bariatric surgery. It included both cross‐sectional and longitudinal studies that used the Yale Food Addiction Scale (YFAS). The following databases were searched: MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, LILACS, PsycArticles, CENTRAL, <jats:ext-link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://greylit.org">greylit.org</jats:ext-link>, and opengrey.eu. Studies that used the YFAS to evaluate FA in pre‐ or postoperative patients were included. A random‐effects meta‐analysis was performed with cross‐sectional studies to calculate the weighted prevalence of FA at the pre‐ and postoperative moments. For longitudinal studies, which measured FA at both time points for the same individuals, absolute prevalence reduction (APR) was calculated. Of the 6626 records, 40 studies were included in the meta‐analysis. The preoperative weighted prevalence of FA was 32% (95% CI: 27–37%; 33 groups), whereas the postoperative prevalence was 15% (95% CI: 12–18%; 14 groups). Seven longitudinal studies showed a weighted APR of 26 p.p. (95% CI: 10–41 p.p.). Observational data suggest a reduction in the prevalence of FA among patients that undergo bariatric surgery. Interventional studies are needed to confirm these findings.</jats:p>
Pp. No disponible