Catálogo de publicaciones - revistas
Science
Resumen/Descripción – provisto por la editorial
No disponible.
Palabras clave – provistas por la editorial
No disponibles.
Disponibilidad
| Institución detectada | Período | Navegá | Descargá | Solicitá |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No detectada | desde mar. 1997 / hasta dic. 2023 | Science Journals |
Información
Tipo de recurso:
revistas
ISSN impreso
0036-8075
ISSN electrónico
1095-9203
Editor responsable
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
País de edición
Estados Unidos
Fecha de publicación
1880-
Cobertura temática
Tabla de contenidos
Closing the Cycle
Palabras clave: Multidisciplinary.
Pp. 523-523
Lord of the Robotic Flies
Palabras clave: Multidisciplinary.
Pp. 523-523
Dissecting Serotonin Receptors
Palabras clave: Multidisciplinary.
Pp. 523-523
From Coils to Cages
Palabras clave: Multidisciplinary.
Pp. 523-523
Magnetic Frustration
Palabras clave: Multidisciplinary.
Pp. 523-523
Is Any Science Safe?
Kenneth Prewitt
<jats:p> This month, the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF) will apply two criteria in its review of research proposals: intellectual merit and impact. One discipline, however, will have to meet a further test. In March, at the urging of U.S. Senator Tom Coburn (R-OK), Congress halted funding for political science—“except for†research that the agency's director certifies as “promoting national security or the economic interests of the United States.†This extra test might not stop with political science. Representative Bill Posey (R-FL), in an NSF oversight hearing on 17 April, asked John Holdren, President Obama's science adviser, why Coburn's two criteria were not “a good and proper filter†to apply to all NSF grants, eliciting this response: “… it's a dangerous thing for Congress, or anybody else, to be trying to specify in detail what types of fundamental research NSF should be funding.†<jats:xref ref-type="fn">*</jats:xref> The United States has benefitted enormously from a government/science partnership carefully designed by Congress over many decades. There have been bumps along the way; it is challenging to reconcile scientific autonomy with Congress's responsibility for public funds. Coburn's “except for†clause is potentially a very large bump. </jats:p>
Palabras clave: Multidisciplinary.
Pp. 525-525
Gaming Knowledge
M. McCartney
Palabras clave: Multidisciplinary.
Pp. 526-526
Palm Monoculture Bad for Birds
A. M. Sugden
Palabras clave: Multidisciplinary.
Pp. 526-526
Supernova Grains Identified in the Lab
M. Cruz
Palabras clave: Multidisciplinary.
Pp. 526-526