Catálogo de publicaciones - revistas

Compartir en
redes sociales

Science

Resumen/Descripción – provisto por la editorial

No disponible.

Palabras clave – provistas por la editorial

No disponibles.

Disponibilidad

Institución detectada	Período	Navegá	Descargá	Solicitá
No detectada	desde mar. 1997 / hasta dic. 2023	Science Journals

Información

Tipo de recurso:

revistas

ISSN impreso

0036-8075

ISSN electrónico

1095-9203

Editor responsable

American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

País de edición

Estados Unidos

Fecha de publicación

1880-

Cobertura temática

Ciencias naturales

Tabla de contenidos

Verificá que desde tu institución tengas acceso para descargar o solicitar el libro completo o alguno de sus capítulos.

doi: 10.1126/science.aam6406

Dams threaten rare Mekong dolphins

Robert L. Brownell; Randall R. Reeves; Peter O. Thomas; Brian D. Smith; Gerard E. Ryan

Palabras clave: Multidisciplinary.

Pp. 805-805

doi: 10.1126/science.aam7686

Photos belong in the taxonomic Code

André Rinaldo Senna Garraffoni; André Victor Lucci Freitas

Palabras clave: Multidisciplinary.

Pp. 805-805

doi: 10.1126/science.aam8703

Lee Rubin: Our mentor and role model

Chantal Bazenet; Howard Desmond; Eric Frank; Patrick Doherty; Andreas Eilers; Christine Gatchalian; Marcie Glicksman; Piotr Graczyk; Fabian Gusovsky; Jonathan Ham; David Kaplan; Michael Klymkoswsky; Karen Kotkow; Richard Krolewski; Paul Lang; Alison Linsley O'Neil; Mary Jane McCarthy; Karina Meiri; Freda Miller; Monica Mota Neumage; Ceren Ozek; Karen Philpott; Silvia Piccinotti; Feodor Price; Martin Raff; Marianne Ratcliffe; Jane Relton; Ken Rhodes; James Schwob; Caroline Smales; Terrence Smith; Cesare Spadoni; Joanne Taylor; Kostas Vekrellis; Jonny Whitfield

Palabras clave: Multidisciplinary.

Pp. 806-806

doi: 10.1126/science.aah6047

Comment on “Ducklings imprint on the relational concept of ‘same or different’”

Jean-Michel Hupé

<jats:p> Martinho and Kacelnik’s (Reports, 15 July 2016, p. 286) finding that mallard ducklings can deal with abstract concepts is important for understanding the evolution of cognition. However, a statistically more robust analysis of the data calls their conclusions into question. This example brings to light the risk of drawing too strong an inference by relying solely on <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> values. </jats:p>

Palabras clave: Multidisciplinary.

Pp. 806-806

doi: 10.1126/science.aai8397

Response to Comments on “Ducklings imprint on the relational concept of ‘same or different’”

Antone Martinho; Alex Kacelnik

<jats:p>Two Comments by Hupé and by Langbein and Puppe address our choice of statistical analysis in assigning preference between sets of stimuli to individual ducklings in our paper. We believe that our analysis remains the most appropriate approach for our data and experimental design.</jats:p>

Palabras clave: Multidisciplinary.

Pp. 806-806

doi: 10.1126/science.aai7431

Comment on “Ducklings imprint on the relational concept of ‘same or different’”

Jan Langbein; Birger Puppe

<jats:p>Martinho and Kacelnik (Reports, 15 July 2016, p. 286) reported that newly hatched ducklings imprinted on relational concepts. We argue that reanalyzing the data at the individual level shows that this conclusion cannot be applied for all sets of stimuli presented and that the ability to grasp relational concepts is limited to the stimulus category that is most beneficial for survival.</jats:p>

Palabras clave: Multidisciplinary.

Pp. 806-806

doi: 10.1126/science.355.6327.807