Catálogo de publicaciones - revistas

<jats:p> In February 2014, the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) announced the decision to launch <jats:italic>Science Advances</jats:italic> as a way to “expand the…content of <jats:italic>Science</jats:italic> ” ( <jats:ext-link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://science.sciencemag.org/content/343/6172/709.full">science.sciencemag.org/content/343/6172/709.full</jats:ext-link> ). The new publication was envisioned as a multidisciplinary, open-access, digital-only journal, edited by a team of scientists actively engaged in research. The first <jats:italic>Science Advances</jats:italic> papers were published within a year. Now, nearly three-and-a-half years later, <jats:italic>Science Advances</jats:italic> is soon to publish its 2000th paper—a good time to examine how the journal is fulfilling its founding vision. </jats:p>

<jats:p>A roundup of weekly science policy and related news</jats:p>

<jats:p>Vaccine-derived virus spreads despite emergency response</jats:p>

<jats:p>Congressional panel seeks greater transparency on private donations to foundations that aid federal research</jats:p>

<jats:p>In New Mexico, a renewed attempt to build an optical array could bring spy satellites into focus</jats:p>

<jats:p>Plan would bring genetic sequences under Nagoya Protocol</jats:p>

<jats:p>Congress favors the Versatile Fast Neutron Source but some scientists see little need</jats:p>

<jats:p>An investigation finds a pattern of after-the-fact compensation by pharma to those advising the U.S. government on drug approvals</jats:p>

<jats:p>Many FDA staff overseeing drug reviews end up working for makers of those drugs</jats:p>

<jats:p>On 7 May 2018, the Board on Higher Education and Workforce of the U.S. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) released a report recommending that humanities, arts, crafts, and design (HACD) practices be integrated with science, technology, engineering, mathematics, and medicine (STEMM) in college and post-graduate curricula. Because the ecology of education is so complex, the report concludes that there is no one, or best, way to integrate arts and humanities with STEMM learning, nor any single type of pedagogical experiment or set of data that proves incontrovertibly that integration is the definitive answer to improved job preparedness. Nonetheless, a preponderance of evidence converges on the conclusion that incorporating HACD into STEMM pedagogies can improve STEMM performance.</jats:p>